Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

H1000 is on my would like listing of powders also. Perhaps the IMR Enduron series are going to be effectively preferred and I am able to move to that for greater availability.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain sizing, thus, the designation SC or quick Slash. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels allow the powder to movement in the powder measures extra smoothly, assisting to relieve the regular cutting of granules.

What is actually the difference? Compression. Without the Intense/large compression connected to the long grain 7828, the tension curve was altered and also the load fell apart.

Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or standard) and lot you will be utilizing nevertheless. Similar burn charge doesn't mean it is going to behave "accurately" exactly the same. I've viewed around 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp many H4831.

INgunner54 mentioned: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Observed a node and shot some teams.

Liberalism; The unachievable still acknowledged notion that it is solely attainable to pick up a turd by the thoroughly clean finish.

Nampa, Idaho In my encounter the only genuine distinction is that the shortcut meters improved as a result of reloading machines. At the time It is loaded theres no functional difference. I have listened to that the shortcut can have a tiny bit more quickly burn rate but It appears insignificant.

and you may want to spend money on some new load data textbooks. powder composition and chemistry can does alter over time. 4831 powder of several years ago is just not very same as what's now available. that is certainly why a person seriously interested in reloading safely will likely have the most recent h4831sc load data books to seek advice from.

I've observed the exact opposite to be real in my gun. H4831SC was the h4831sc load data slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally precise powder in my three hundred Win Mag.

In addition it goes on to state that due to the fshorter grains, that load density might be marginally larger.

I've experienced equivalent encounter with H4350. For me, some ball powders will never shoot very well with anything at all except Fed215's. Some parts just Never Participate in very well with other. Looks like you've got picked three excellent powders, I'd personally assume a minimum of one of these to shoot.

I use 52 grs H4831sc with a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It is really exact, gentle mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it absolutely was me, I might start at fifty two gr and function up.

I realize the H4831SC presents a much better load density But I feel I have plenty of space in my situation for the traditional H4831.

I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Just after months, I obtained Fortunate and caught some H1000 on-line not to mention compensated just a little additional. The very future week at a gun exhibit a guy experienced an entire case of H1000 for $forty per 1lb. I ignore the amount, but Together with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and h4831sc load data it’s a mild load.